In re the Board of Water Supply

235 A.D. 752
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order modified so as to allow $2,000 counsel fees and $15,207.48, expenses and disbursements, as recommended by the commissioners of appraisal, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. All concur, except Hill, J., who concurs in the modification as to counsel fees, expenses and disbursements, and dissents to the affirmance of the order, and votes to modify by fixing the price per kilowatt hour at four and twenty-nine one-hundredths mills, such being the price paid by the claimant to the State of New York for the power obtained at Crescent dam; with this modification the award to the claimant should be $159,500, for which amount he votes. McNamee, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Board of Water Supply, 235 A.D. 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 752 (In re the Board of Water Supply) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re The Board of Water Supply
157 Misc. 842 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)