In re the Board of Commissioners

335 S.E.2d 527, 77 N.C. App. 596, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 4161
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided October 29, 1985·No. No. 851DC337·Published

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

Appellants contend, and the State concedes, that Judge Chaf-fin’s order was entered without following necessary procedural requirements for jurisdiction and due process. Specifically, the in-junctive order was not issued incident to any pending action. No complaint was filed and no summons was issued. Therefore, the court did not have jurisdiction to issue an injunction. Swindell v. Overton, 62 N.C. App. 160, 302 S.E. 2d 841 (1983), rev’d on other [598]*598grounds, 310 N.C. 707, 314 S.E. 2d 512 (1984). Further, the order was issued ex mero motu with no notice or opportunity to be heard given to Appellants. The order is void and is, therefore, vacated.

Chief Judge HEDRICK and Judge BECTON concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Board of Commissioners, 335 S.E.2d 527, 77 N.C. App. 596, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 4161 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985).

335 S.E.2d 527 (In re the Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swindell v. Overton
314 S.E.2d 512 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1984)
Swindell v. Overton
302 S.E.2d 841 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)