In re the Benefit of Creditors of Adler

New York Supreme Court

In re the Benefit of Creditors of Adler

181 Misc. 313, 43 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2208

DecidedJune 17, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 181 Misc. 313 (In re the Benefit of Creditors of Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Benefit of Creditors of Adler, 181 Misc. 313, 43 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2208 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Eder, J.

Motion by assignee for benefit of creditors to sell the chattels and fixtures located at premises 242 Columbus Avenue, free and clear of the lien of the chattel mortgage made by Victory Stationery Co., Inc., to Anna Kaplan, dated February 28, 1941, and that said chattels and fixtures referred to in said chattel mortgage are now free and clear of the mortgage.

The assignee contends that the failure of the mortgagee to comply with section 235 of the Lien Law in failing to file a renewal statement or a copy of the mortgage after the filing of February 24,1942, vitiated the mortgage as against the creditors of the mortgagor and released the chattels and fixtures of the mortgagor from the lien of the chattel mortgage at least insofar as the creditors of the mortgagor are concerned.

The mortgagee counters with the contention that the mortgagor defaulted in payment long before the filing date and that under those circumstances title to the chattels and fixtures vested in the mortgagee immediately upon such default, citing Harrison v. Hall (239 N. Y. 51, 52), where it is said that a mortgagee of chattels after default is at law the owner.

This is true enough as between the parties, but as-respects creditors, default in payment due under a chattel mortgage did not relieve the mortgagee from the necessity of refiling the chattel mortgage under section 235, where the mortgagee did not take possession of the property covered by the chattel mort[314]*314gage, since the default did not give the mortgagee complete legal title and “ Only an actual change of possession, not merely a constructive or legal change, will relieve from refiling the chattel mortgage ” (Matter of Parkway Knitting Mills, 36 F. Supp. 299, affd. 119 F. 2d 605, certiorari denied sub nom. Elstelnat Holding Corp. v. Palmer, 314 U. S. 646). That case construed section 235 of our Lien Law, and is decisive here.

The mortgagee has lost her rights as against the assignee and the assigned estate and has no lien or interest in the mortgaged property or to the proceeds or avails thereof, and the motion is granted as prayed for. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eder, J.

Motion by assignee for benefit of creditors to sell the chattels and fixtures located at premises 242 Columbus Avenue, free and clear of the lien of the chattel mortgage made by Victory Stationery Co., Inc., to Anna Kaplan, dated February 28, 1941, and that said chattels and fixtures referred to in said chattel mortgage are now free and clear of the mortgage.

The assignee contends that the failure of the mortgagee to comply with section 235 of the Lien Law in failing to file a renewal statement or a copy of the mortgage after the filing of February 24,1942, vitiated the mortgage as against the creditors of the mortgagor and released the chattels and fixtures of the mortgagor from the lien of the chattel mortgage at least insofar as the creditors of the mortgagor are concerned.

The mortgagee counters with the contention that the mortgagor defaulted in payment long before the filing date and that under those circumstances title to the chattels and fixtures vested in the mortgagee immediately upon such default, citing Harrison v. Hall (239 N. Y. 51, 52), where it is said that a mortgagee of chattels after default is at law the owner.

This is true enough as between the parties, but as-respects creditors, default in payment due under a chattel mortgage did not relieve the mortgagee from the necessity of refiling the chattel mortgage under section 235, where the mortgagee did not take possession of the property covered by the chattel mort[314]*314gage, since the default did not give the mortgagee complete legal title and “ Only an actual change of possession, not merely a constructive or legal change, will relieve from refiling the chattel mortgage ” (Matter of Parkway Knitting Mills, 36 F. Supp. 299, affd. 119 F. 2d 605, certiorari denied sub nom. Elstelnat Holding Corp. v. Palmer, 314 U. S. 646). That case construed section 235 of our Lien Law, and is decisive here.

The mortgagee has lost her rights as against the assignee and the assigned estate and has no lien or interest in the mortgaged property or to the proceeds or avails thereof, and the motion is granted as prayed for. Settle order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 Misc. 313, 43 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-benefit-of-creditors-of-adler-nysupct-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack