In re the Assignment of Worthley

10 Daly 12
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJuly 1, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 Daly 12 (In re the Assignment of Worthley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Assignment of Worthley, 10 Daly 12 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Opinion

Van Hoesen, J.

I will not sign the proposed decree. The amounts must be specified. No such looseness can be permitted as the proposed decree makes .possible. It is .not enough [13]*13that the amounts are small, and the counsel reputable. If this decree is signed, it becomes a precedent, and it may result in loss to some estate where the parties are .different from those wno propose this decree.

Again, I cannot allow anything to Lindsay & Flammer. The allowance is to the assignee, and is made as one of the expenses of his execution of the trust.

There will be no difficulty in having a proper decree signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Accounting of Ludeke
22 Misc. 676 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
In re Ludeke
50 N.Y.S. 952 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Daly 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-assignment-of-worthley-nyctcompl-1878.