In re the Assignment of Worthley

New York Court of Common Pleas

In re the Assignment of Worthley

10 Daly 12

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided July 1, 1878·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Van Hoesen, J.

I will not sign the proposed decree. The amounts must be specified. No such looseness can be permitted as the proposed decree makes .possible. It is .not enough [13] that the amounts are small, and the counsel reputable. If this decree is signed, it becomes a precedent, and it may result in loss to some estate where the parties are .different from those wno propose this decree.

Again, I cannot allow anything to Lindsay & Flammer. The allowance is to the assignee, and is made as one of the expenses of his execution of the trust.

There will be no difficulty in having a proper decree signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Hoesen, J.

I will not sign the proposed decree. The amounts must be specified. No such looseness can be permitted as the proposed decree makes .possible. It is .not enough [13] that the amounts are small, and the counsel reputable. If this decree is signed, it becomes a precedent, and it may result in loss to some estate where the parties are .different from those wno propose this decree.

Again, I cannot allow anything to Lindsay & Flammer. The allowance is to the assignee, and is made as one of the expenses of his execution of the trust.

There will be no difficulty in having a proper decree signed.

In re the Assignment of Worthley, 10 Daly 12 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

10 Daly 12 (In re the Assignment of Worthley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related