In re the Assignment of Robinson

New York Court of Common Pleas

In re the Assignment of Robinson

10 Daly 148

DecidedJanuary 3, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Daly 148 (In re the Assignment of Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Assignment of Robinson, 10 Daly 148 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Van Hoesen, J.

The bond of the assignee has never been ' approved. A justice of the Supreme Court has no power to [149]*149approve the bond of an assignee appointed under the General Assignment Act of 1877, and his action in approving such a bond is a nullity. The Code of Civil Procedure does not apply to proceedings under the Assignment Act. The bond of an assignee under the Act of 1877 can not be approved by any other judge than a county judge (L. 1877, c. 466, § 5). The assignee has therefore been acting without lawful authority in disposing of the assigned estate. Before he could lawfully “sell, dispose of or convert to the purposes of the trust any of the assigned property,” it was his duty to obtain the approval of his bond by a judge of the Court of Common Pleas. This is sufficient cause for removal.

But there is another cause.

In order to obtain sureties, he paid out money of the assigned estate. Directly he did not pay his sureties for becoming his bondsmen, but he gave to his counsel money belonging to the estate, with the understanding that his counsel would furnish the sureties, and pay what was necessary to procure them. This is, to all intents and purposes, using the assigned estate for the purchase of bondsmen.

The assignee must be removed.

Application granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Hoesen, J.

The bond of the assignee has never been ' approved. A justice of the Supreme Court has no power to [149]*149approve the bond of an assignee appointed under the General Assignment Act of 1877, and his action in approving such a bond is a nullity. The Code of Civil Procedure does not apply to proceedings under the Assignment Act. The bond of an assignee under the Act of 1877 can not be approved by any other judge than a county judge (L. 1877, c. 466, § 5). The assignee has therefore been acting without lawful authority in disposing of the assigned estate. Before he could lawfully “sell, dispose of or convert to the purposes of the trust any of the assigned property,” it was his duty to obtain the approval of his bond by a judge of the Court of Common Pleas. This is sufficient cause for removal.

But there is another cause.

In order to obtain sureties, he paid out money of the assigned estate. Directly he did not pay his sureties for becoming his bondsmen, but he gave to his counsel money belonging to the estate, with the understanding that his counsel would furnish the sureties, and pay what was necessary to procure them. This is, to all intents and purposes, using the assigned estate for the purchase of bondsmen.

The assignee must be removed.

Application granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Daly 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-assignment-of-robinson-nyctcompl-1884.