In re the Assignment of Orsor

New York Court of Common Pleas

In re the Assignment of Orsor

10 Daly 26

CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas

DecidedJune 4, 1879

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Daly 26 (In re the Assignment of Orsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Assignment of Orsor, 10 Daly 26 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

J. F. Daly, J.

A majority of the assignor’s creditors (if not all excepting these petitioners), agreed to a composition of thirty cents on the dollar payable in notes of the assignor indorsed by the assignee, and consented to the assignee continuing the insolvent’s business for the purpose of providing for the notes. Petitioners did not agree to this arrangement, and called the assignee to account for his dealings with the trust. The value of the goods and fixtures that came to his possession, and the debts collected by him amounted altogether to $910.44. He took this stock, added new purchases of his own and carried on the business for a short period, paying a part of the notes and ultimately winding up with a loss of $1,247.60 to himself. I do not gather from the papers, that of this loss more than $500 at the outside, was for payments on the notes ; that is to say, he did not pay much, if anything, over a fourth [27]*27of the thirty per cent. It would seem, therefore, that at least $700 of the loss was upon the business. The referee charges him with the value of the estate he received from the assignee in the first instance, allowing him nothing for his losses in carrying on the business. This is correct. Had he made a profit in that business he would have been chargeable with that profit in addition to the value of the assigned estate, but he is not to be allowed his losses on the experiment. On the other hand he is not chargeable with the gross receipts of the business without regard to the cost of carrying it on. If he speculated and lost, he is chargeable only with the full value of the assets originally received, and allowed only the expenses of getting them in. This the referee has found, and his report should be confirmed.

The petitioners are entitled to be paid only the proportion they, in common with all the creditors, would have received of those assets, had no composition been made. This is found by the referee to be a less sum than the petitioners have already received, and nothing is therefore due them.

Report confirmed, with $10 costs of motion to assignee against petitioners.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. F. Daly, J.

A majority of the assignor’s creditors (if not all excepting these petitioners), agreed to a composition of thirty cents on the dollar payable in notes of the assignor indorsed by the assignee, and consented to the assignee continuing the insolvent’s business for the purpose of providing for the notes. Petitioners did not agree to this arrangement, and called the assignee to account for his dealings with the trust. The value of the goods and fixtures that came to his possession, and the debts collected by him amounted altogether to $910.44. He took this stock, added new purchases of his own and carried on the business for a short period, paying a part of the notes and ultimately winding up with a loss of $1,247.60 to himself. I do not gather from the papers, that of this loss more than $500 at the outside, was for payments on the notes ; that is to say, he did not pay much, if anything, over a fourth [27]*27of the thirty per cent. It would seem, therefore, that at least $700 of the loss was upon the business. The referee charges him with the value of the estate he received from the assignee in the first instance, allowing him nothing for his losses in carrying on the business. This is correct. Had he made a profit in that business he would have been chargeable with that profit in addition to the value of the assigned estate, but he is not to be allowed his losses on the experiment. On the other hand he is not chargeable with the gross receipts of the business without regard to the cost of carrying it on. If he speculated and lost, he is chargeable only with the full value of the assets originally received, and allowed only the expenses of getting them in. This the referee has found, and his report should be confirmed.

The petitioners are entitled to be paid only the proportion they, in common with all the creditors, would have received of those assets, had no composition been made. This is found by the referee to be a less sum than the petitioners have already received, and nothing is therefore due them.

Report confirmed, with $10 costs of motion to assignee against petitioners.

Order accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Daly 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-assignment-of-orsor-nyctcompl-1879.

Opinion

J. F. Daly, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack