In re the Assignment of Goldschmidt

New York Court of Common Pleas

In re the Assignment of Goldschmidt

10 Daly 38

DecidedNovember 15, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Daly 38 (In re the Assignment of Goldschmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Assignment of Goldschmidt, 10 Daly 38 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

J. F. Daly, J.

The assignee has done his duty in bringing the proposed offer of compromise on the part of attaching creditors to the attention of the court and inviting the persons interested in the estate to consider it. The opposition to the proposed compromise is general on the part of the preferred creditors, however. And. as they are most interested in the result of the pending action against the sheriff, and their testimony is available for the assignee on the trial, he should proceed with the suit.

Motion denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. F. Daly, J.

The assignee has done his duty in bringing the proposed offer of compromise on the part of attaching creditors to the attention of the court and inviting the persons interested in the estate to consider it. The opposition to the proposed compromise is general on the part of the preferred creditors, however. And. as they are most interested in the result of the pending action against the sheriff, and their testimony is available for the assignee on the trial, he should proceed with the suit.

Motion denied, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Daly 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-assignment-of-goldschmidt-nyctcompl-1879.