In re the Arbitration of Controversies between Sheffield Farms Co. & Hibbits

264 A.D. 843, 35 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4989
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 19, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 264 A.D. 843 (In re the Arbitration of Controversies between Sheffield Farms Co. & Hibbits) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration of Controversies between Sheffield Farms Co. & Hibbits, 264 A.D. 843, 35 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order must be affirmed solely on the ground that the award against the respondent is not within the scope of the controversy submitted to the arbitrator in accordance with the procedure specified in the contract.

The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Arbitration between Deering Milliken & Co. & Boepple Sportswear Mills, Inc.
4 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
In re the Arbitration Between Kingswood Management Corp. & Salzman
272 A.D.2d 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D. 843, 35 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-of-controversies-between-sheffield-farms-co-nyappdiv-1942.