In re the Arbitration of Certain Controversies between Common School District No. 9 & Tooker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration of Certain Controversies between Common School District No. 9 & Tooker

242 A.D. 644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 644 (In re the Arbitration of Certain Controversies between Common School District No. 9 & Tooker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration of Certain Controversies between Common School District No. 9 & Tooker, 242 A.D. 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order confirming, as modified, award of arbitrators and judgment entered upon said order unanimously affirmed, with costs. It is conceded in the appellant’s brief that the school district authorized an additional appropriation of $50,000 over and above the original appropriation of $192,000. These two appropriations aggregated a sum in excess of the cost of the work. This being so, the question of illegality of contract, in so far as concerns a sufficient appropriation to meet the cost of the work, is not of concern on this appeal. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order confirming, as modified, award of arbitrators and judgment entered upon said order unanimously affirmed, with costs. It is conceded in the appellant’s brief that the school district authorized an additional appropriation of $50,000 over and above the original appropriation of $192,000. These two appropriations aggregated a sum in excess of the cost of the work. This being so, the question of illegality of contract, in so far as concerns a sufficient appropriation to meet the cost of the work, is not of concern on this appeal. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-of-certain-controversies-between-common-school-nyappdiv-1934.