In re the Arbitration of a Dispute & Controversy Existing between Marine Dredging Corp. & Goldsmith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration of a Dispute & Controversy Existing between Marine Dredging Corp. & Goldsmith

261 A.D. 982, 27 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8424

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 1941·Published

Opinion

Arbitration proceeding to determine a controversy in relation to a dredging contract. Order denying appellant’s motion to confirm an award made by a majority of the arbitrators, and granting respondent’s cross-motion to vacate said award, based upon the ground that the arbitrator selected by the appellant had such an undisclosed interest in the party selecting him, as to disqualify him, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arbitration proceeding to determine a controversy in relation to a dredging contract. Order denying appellant’s motion to confirm an award made by a majority of the arbitrators, and granting respondent’s cross-motion to vacate said award, based upon the ground that the arbitrator selected by the appellant had such an undisclosed interest in the party selecting him, as to disqualify him, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

In re the Arbitration of a Dispute & Controversy Existing between Marine Dredging Corp. & Goldsmith, 261 A.D. 982, 27 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 982 (In re the Arbitration of a Dispute & Controversy Existing between Marine Dredging Corp. & Goldsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.