In re the Arbitration of a Dispute & Controversy Existing between Marine Dredging Corp. & Goldsmith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration of a Dispute & Controversy Existing between Marine Dredging Corp. & Goldsmith

261 A.D. 982, 27 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8424

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 982 (In re the Arbitration of a Dispute & Controversy Existing between Marine Dredging Corp. & Goldsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration of a Dispute & Controversy Existing between Marine Dredging Corp. & Goldsmith, 261 A.D. 982, 27 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Arbitration proceeding to determine a controversy in relation to a dredging contract. Order denying appellant’s motion to confirm an award made by a majority of the arbitrators, and granting respondent’s cross-motion to vacate said award, based upon the ground that the arbitrator selected by the appellant had such an undisclosed interest in the party selecting him, as to disqualify him, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arbitration proceeding to determine a controversy in relation to a dredging contract. Order denying appellant’s motion to confirm an award made by a majority of the arbitrators, and granting respondent’s cross-motion to vacate said award, based upon the ground that the arbitrator selected by the appellant had such an undisclosed interest in the party selecting him, as to disqualify him, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 982, 27 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-of-a-dispute-controversy-existing-between-marine-nyappdiv-1941.