In re the Arbitration Concerning Certain Differences between St. John's Guild & Durkin & Laas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration Concerning Certain Differences between St. John's Guild & Durkin & Laas

168 A.D. 889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 A.D. 889 (In re the Arbitration Concerning Certain Differences between St. John's Guild & Durkin & Laas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration Concerning Certain Differences between St. John's Guild & Durkin & Laas, 168 A.D. 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The objection that the arbitrators were not sworn is a fatal one, the oaths not having been waived in writing. (Code Civ. Proc: § 2369; Hinkle v. Zimmerman, 184 N. Y. 114.) The case appears to be a proper one, however, in which to direct a rehearing before the same arbitrators as authorized by section 2374 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Their failure to take the prescribed oaths did not, under the circumstances, indicate partiality or incompetence. The order appealed from will, therefore, be modified accordingly, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The objection that the arbitrators were not sworn is a fatal one, the oaths not having been waived in writing. (Code Civ. Proc: § 2369; Hinkle v. Zimmerman, 184 N. Y. 114.) The case appears to be a proper one, however, in which to direct a rehearing before the same arbitrators as authorized by section 2374 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Their failure to take the prescribed oaths did not, under the circumstances, indicate partiality or incompetence. The order appealed from will, therefore, be modified accordingly, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-concerning-certain-differences-between-st-johns-nyappdiv-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack