In re the Arbitration between Wes-Tal, Inc. & Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Wes-Tal, Inc. & Mills

20 A.D.2d 876, 251 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 876 (In re the Arbitration between Wes-Tal, Inc. & Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Wes-Tal, Inc. & Mills, 20 A.D.2d 876, 251 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on or about October 21, 1963, denying petitioners’ motion to disqualify the arbitrator and to enjoin him from acting in that capacity, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. This determination is without prejudice and without passing upon the right of appellants to interpose any arguments or facts with respect to the effectiveness or validity of the award rendered on default, on the pending motion to confirm the award or on any cross motion to vacate it. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on or about October 21, 1963, denying petitioners’ motion to disqualify the arbitrator and to enjoin him from acting in that capacity, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. This determination is without prejudice and without passing upon the right of appellants to interpose any arguments or facts with respect to the effectiveness or validity of the award rendered on default, on the pending motion to confirm the award or on any cross motion to vacate it. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 876, 251 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-wes-tal-inc-mills-nyappdiv-1964.