In re the Arbitration between Weinrott & Carp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Weinrott & Carp

37 A.D.2d 548, 322 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3720

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 548 (In re the Arbitration between Weinrott & Carp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Weinrott & Carp, 37 A.D.2d 548, 322 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 20, 1970, confirming award of arbitrators unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellants $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. We are of the opinion that Special Term was correct in confirming the award. The principal objections raised are of the "same character as those raised in a very recent case in this court (Matter of Baar & Beards [Oleg Cassini, Inc.], 37 A D 2d 106). Without discussing the .distinctions between that and the instant case which we believe warrant a contrary determination, we wish to point out a similar condition which, unfortunately, requires mention. Both arbitrations were conducted by the American Arbitration Association through the office of its Tribunal Administrator. In both eases there was laxity in following the Association’s own rules. The Association, through a long and active career, has gained an enviable reputation for the absolute impartiality of its conduct in all the various steps and phases of arbitrations — so much so that it is commonly designated by parties in contracts providing for arbitration. A meticulous adherence not only to those rules, but to the purpose thereof, is an inviolate necessity for the maintenance of that deserved regard. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Kupferman, Steuer and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 20, 1970, confirming award of arbitrators unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellants $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. We are of the opinion that Special Term was correct in confirming the award. The principal objections raised are of the "same character as those raised in a very recent case in this court (Matter of Baar & Beards [Oleg Cassini, Inc.], 37 A D 2d 106). Without discussing the .distinctions between that and the instant case which we believe warrant a contrary determination, we wish to point out a similar condition which, unfortunately, requires mention. Both arbitrations were conducted by the American Arbitration Association through the office of its Tribunal Administrator. In both eases there was laxity in following the Association’s own rules. The Association, through a long and active career, has gained an enviable reputation for the absolute impartiality of its conduct in all the various steps and phases of arbitrations — so much so that it is commonly designated by parties in contracts providing for arbitration. A meticulous adherence not only to those rules, but to the purpose thereof, is an inviolate necessity for the maintenance of that deserved regard. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Kupferman, Steuer and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 548, 322 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-weinrott-carp-nyappdiv-1971.