In re the Arbitration between Vigo Steamship Corp. & Marship Corp. of Monrovia
261 N.E.2d 112, 27 N.Y.2d 535, 312 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1313
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied upon the ground that the opinion of the court (26 N Y 2d 157) clearly indicates that Federal questions were passed upon. (See People v. Baker, 23 N Y 2d 898.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Arbitration between Vigo Steamship Corp. & Marship Corp. of Monrovia, 261 N.E.2d 112, 27 N.Y.2d 535, 312 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1313 (N.Y. 1970).
261 N.E.2d 112 (In re the Arbitration between Vigo Steamship Corp. & Marship Corp. of Monrovia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Electric Coop. v. Brown Twp., 2006-Cah-11-0084 (7-9-2007)
2007 Ohio 3507 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)