In re the Arbitration between Verheyleweghen & Edwards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Verheyleweghen & Edwards

30 A.D.2d 655, 292 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3721

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 655 (In re the Arbitration between Verheyleweghen & Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Verheyleweghen & Edwards, 30 A.D.2d 655, 292 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on February 29, 1968, to the extent appealed from, i.e., to the extent that it denied confirmation of items numbered 1 and 6 of the award of arbitrators dated November 28, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and said items reinstated and confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. The arbitration clause extends to any dispute under the agreement, and we are unable to find in the record and particularly in respondent’s affidavit a sufficiently probative substantiation of his claim that the arbitrators exceeded their powers. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on February 29, 1968, to the extent appealed from, i.e., to the extent that it denied confirmation of items numbered 1 and 6 of the award of arbitrators dated November 28, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and said items reinstated and confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. The arbitration clause extends to any dispute under the agreement, and we are unable to find in the record and particularly in respondent’s affidavit a sufficiently probative substantiation of his claim that the arbitrators exceeded their powers. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 655, 292 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-verheyleweghen-edwards-nyappdiv-1968.