In re the Arbitration between USI Agri Business Co. & SKA, S.p.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between USI Agri Business Co. & SKA, S.p.A.

159 A.D.2d 375

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 375 (In re the Arbitration between USI Agri Business Co. & SKA, S.p.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between USI Agri Business Co. & SKA, S.p.A., 159 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.), entered on or about August 28, 1989, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by McCooe, J. Respondent shall recover of appellants one bill of $250 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Petitioner-appellant Big Dutchman’s motion for a stay pending hearing and determination of the appeal is denied as moot. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.), entered on or about August 28, 1989, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by McCooe, J. Respondent shall recover of appellants one bill of $250 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Petitioner-appellant Big Dutchman’s motion for a stay pending hearing and determination of the appeal is denied as moot. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-usi-agri-business-co-ska-spa-nyappdiv-1990.