Home/New York Court of Appeals/In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.

In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.

159 N.E.2d 212, 6 N.Y.2d 773, 186 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1413
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 17, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 159 N.E.2d 212 (In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp., 159 N.E.2d 212, 6 N.Y.2d 773, 186 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1413 (N.Y. 1959).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that the contract never became effective because of the failure to make the initial payment upon the terms and within the time provided. Proceedings to compel arbitration presuppose the existence of a valid and enforcible contract (Matter of Kramer & Uchitelle, 288 N. Y. 467).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re: CFCU Community Credit Union
Second Circuit, 2009
El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co., Ltd. v. American Independent Oil Company
289 F.2d 346 (Second Circuit, 1961)
In Re the Arbitration Between El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co. & American Independent Oil Co.
183 F. Supp. 394 (S.D. New York, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 N.E.2d 212, 6 N.Y.2d 773, 186 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-uraga-dock-co-mediterranean-oriental-ny-1959.