In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.
159 N.E.2d 212, 6 N.Y.2d 773, 186 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1413
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that the contract never became effective because of the failure to make the initial payment upon the terms and within the time provided. Proceedings to compel arbitration presuppose the existence of a valid and enforcible contract (Matter of Kramer & Uchitelle, 288 N. Y. 467).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp., 159 N.E.2d 212, 6 N.Y.2d 773, 186 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1413 (N.Y. 1959).
159 N.E.2d 212 (In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re: CFCU Community Credit Union
Second Circuit, 2009
El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co., Ltd. v. American Independent Oil Company
289 F.2d 346 (Second Circuit, 1961)
In Re the Arbitration Between El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co. & American Independent Oil Co.
183 F. Supp. 394 (S.D. New York, 1960)