In re the Arbitration between Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home & Irizarry
57 A.D.3d 1390, 869 N.Y.2d 820
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 2008·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
[1391] It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Lunn, Fahey and Green, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Arbitration between Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home & Irizarry, 57 A.D.3d 1390, 869 N.Y.2d 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 1390 (In re the Arbitration between Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home & Irizarry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)