Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Arbitration between Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home & Irizarry

In re the Arbitration between Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home & Irizarry

57 A.D.3d 1390, 869 N.Y.2d 820
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 2008
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.3d 1390 (In re the Arbitration between Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home & Irizarry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home & Irizarry, 57 A.D.3d 1390, 869 N.Y.2d 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

[1391]*1391It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Lunn, Fahey and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 1390, 869 N.Y.2d 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-unitrin-kemper-auto-home-irizarry-nyappdiv-2008.