In re the Arbitration between Tuzzino & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
This text of 22 A.D.2d 641 (In re the Arbitration between Tuzzino & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered April 13, 1964, denying respondent’s motion for a stay of arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Section 617 of article 17-A of the Insurance Law provides, in part, as follows: “ The protection provided by this article shall not apply * * * unless the bodily injury to the insured or qualified person arose out of physical contact of the motor vehicle causing such bodily injury”. There was an absence of physical contact between the offending vehicle and that of claimants. Hence, respondent-appellant is entitled to a stay of arbitration. (Matter of MVAIC [Stern], 21 A D 2d 856; Matter of MVAIC [Lupo], 18 A D 2d 717, affd. 13 N Y 2d 1017). Concur — Breitel, J. P.,
Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ. [42 Misc 2d 786.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.2d 641, 252 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-tuzzino-motor-vehicle-accident-nyappdiv-1964.