In re the Arbitration between Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority & Bridge & Tunnel Officers Benevolent Ass'n

44 N.Y. 676
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 23, 1978
StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.Y. 676 (In re the Arbitration between Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority & Bridge & Tunnel Officers Benevolent Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority & Bridge & Tunnel Officers Benevolent Ass'n, 44 N.Y. 676 (N.Y. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order should be affirmed, with costs.

There is nothing in statute, decisional law or public policy to interdict the arbitration of the subject matter of this dispute, revolving as it does about such questions as the validity of the authority’s announcement of a policy not to compensate bridge and tunnel officers for making off-duty arrests as peace officers (see CPL 1.20, subd 33, par [x]; 140.25) and whether the particular arrest made by Officer Keno was job related and so constituted on-duty time. Examination of the language of the parties’ arbitration agreement then discloses that it clearly and unequivocally encompasses the dispute at bar. (Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509.)

[678]*678Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 N.Y. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-triborough-bridge-tunnel-authority-bridge-ny-1978.