In re the Arbitration between Teschner & Livingston
132 N.E.2d 333, 309 N.Y. 972, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 1097
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis and Bubke, JJ. Taking no part: Dye, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Arbitration between Teschner & Livingston, 132 N.E.2d 333, 309 N.Y. 972, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 1097 (N.Y. 1956).
132 N.E.2d 333 (In re the Arbitration between Teschner & Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Arbitration between Frank Chevrolet Corp. & Meyers
32 Misc. 2d 1057 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
In re the Arbitration between Fownes Bros. & Consolidated Glove Cutters & Shavers Union Local 1714
14 A.D.2d 235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
In re the Arbitration between Camhi & Undergarment & Negligee Workers Union, Local 62
13 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
In re the Arbitration Between George Rattray & Co. & Trenz
29 Misc. 2d 734 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
In re the Arbitration between Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. & Crotty
23 Misc. 2d 560 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
In re the Arbitration between Saks & Co. & Saks Fifth Avenue Women's Shoe Salespeople Committee
9 A.D.2d 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
In Re the Arbitration Between Otis Elevator Co. & Carney
160 N.E.2d 630 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
In re the Arbitration between Friedstrass Co. & Livingston
16 Misc. 2d 121 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
In Re the Arbitration of Controversies Between Barrett & Miller
166 F. Supp. 929 (S.D. New York, 1958)
In re the Arbitration between New York Mirror & Potoker
5 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
In re the Arbitration between General Warehousemen's Union & Glidden Co.
10 Misc. 2d 700 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
In Re the Arbitration Between Acme Backing Corp. & District 65, Distributive, Processing & Office Workers of America
142 N.E.2d 427 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
In re the Arbitration between Acme Backing Corp. & District 65, Distributive, Processing & Office Workers
2 A.D.2d 61 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)