In re the Arbitration between Swislocki & Spiewak

273 A.D. 768, 75 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3066
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1947·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The power of attorney to plaintiff and the submission to arbitration do not make clear the subject matter of the arbitration, but if, as is otherwise indicated, the subject matter is the distribution -of a decedent’s estate, it would not constitute an arbitrable controversy. That does not mean that plaintiff’s wife might not have .a good and collectible claim through estate administration, or otherwise against defendant for funds originating in an estate but presently in a status beyond any stage of estate administration, which claim might be arbitrable, but on the present submission that does not appear to be the case. Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 80S.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Arbitration between Swislocki & Spiewak, 273 A.D. 768, 75 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

273 A.D. 768 (In re the Arbitration between Swislocki & Spiewak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Glassman v. Cohen
184 N.Y.S.3d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
In re the Arbitration between Berger & Berger
81 A.D.2d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.
36 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
In re the Estate of Jacobovitz
58 Misc. 2d 330 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1968)
In re the Arbitration between Kabinoff & Kabinoff
19 Misc. 2d 15 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)