In re the Arbitration between Swislocki & Spiewak
This text of 273 A.D. 768 (In re the Arbitration between Swislocki & Spiewak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The power of attorney to plaintiff and the submission to arbitration do not make clear the subject matter of the arbitration, but if, as is otherwise indicated, the subject matter is the distribution -of a decedent’s estate, it would not constitute an arbitrable controversy. That does not mean that plaintiff’s wife might not have .a good and collectible claim through estate administration, or otherwise against defendant for funds originating in an estate but presently in a status beyond any stage of estate administration, which claim might be arbitrable, but on the present submission that does not appear to be the case. Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 80S.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 768, 75 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-swislocki-spiewak-nyappdiv-1947.