In re the Arbitration between Suits Galore, Inc. & Stone Ridge Knitting Milis, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Suits Galore, Inc. & Stone Ridge Knitting Milis, Inc.

49 A.D.2d 819, 372 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10934

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 819 (In re the Arbitration between Suits Galore, Inc. & Stone Ridge Knitting Milis, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Suits Galore, Inc. & Stone Ridge Knitting Milis, Inc., 49 A.D.2d 819, 372 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 23, 1975, denying petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondent. It is clear from the record that petitioner received and retained, without objection, the subject contracts, each containing a broad arbitration clause. Moreover, it also appears that goods were subsequently delivered to and accepted by petitioner, and that the invoices which were issued for each of the shipments contained a reference to the particular contract involved. Under the circumstances, petitioner is bound by the arbitration clauses contained in the two contracts, and the application for a stay of arbitration was properly denied. (Matter of Helen Whiting, [Trojan Textile Corp.J 307 NY 360; Trafalger Sq. v Reeves Bros. , 35 AD2d 194.) Concur—Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 23, 1975, denying petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondent. It is clear from the record that petitioner received and retained, without objection, the subject contracts, each containing a broad arbitration clause. Moreover, it also appears that goods were subsequently delivered to and accepted by petitioner, and that the invoices which were issued for each of the shipments contained a reference to the particular contract involved. Under the circumstances, petitioner is bound by the arbitration clauses contained in the two contracts, and the application for a stay of arbitration was properly denied. (Matter of Helen Whiting, [Trojan Textile Corp.J 307 NY 360; Trafalger Sq. v Reeves Bros. , 35 AD2d 194.) Concur—Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 819, 372 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-suits-galore-inc-stone-ridge-knitting-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack