In re the Arbitration between Sovereign Construction Co. & Bloomfield Building Wreckers

5 A.D.2d 866, 172 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6524

This text of 5 A.D.2d 866 (In re the Arbitration between Sovereign Construction Co. & Bloomfield Building Wreckers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Sovereign Construction Co. & Bloomfield Building Wreckers, 5 A.D.2d 866, 172 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

The judgment should be affirmed, with eosts. The plaintiff failed to make out a prima' facie case. He failed to prove that he introduced the defendant Leopold D. Silberstein to any person owning, leasing or controlling properties subsequently acquired by the corporate defendant Penn-Texas Corporation, and the proof fails to establish that the acquisition of the Sullivan [867]*867and Garnett properties in Texas was causally related to information furnished or caused to be furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants, or either of them.

Coneur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.2d 866, 172 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-sovereign-construction-co-bloomfield-nyappdiv-1958.