In re the Arbitration between Rosenblum & Government Employees Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

In re the Arbitration between Rosenblum & Government Employees Insurance

41 N.Y. 966

DecidedMarch 31, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.Y. 966 (In re the Arbitration between Rosenblum & Government Employees Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Rosenblum & Government Employees Insurance, 41 N.Y. 966 (N.Y. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum. The term "claimant” in subdivision 2 of section 675 of the Insurance Law encompasses assignees of medical claims against insurance carriers, and there is no indication in the statute that the Legislature did not intend to require insurers to arbitrate disputed claims assigned to such persons. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum. The term "claimant” in subdivision 2 of section 675 of the Insurance Law encompasses assignees of medical claims against insurance carriers, and there is no indication in the statute that the Legislature did not intend to require insurers to arbitrate disputed claims assigned to such persons. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.Y. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-rosenblum-government-employees-insurance-ny-1977.