In re the Arbitration between Romanoff & Nilow Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Romanoff & Nilow Realty Corp.

273 A.D. 788, 75 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3164

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1947·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate an order which confirms an award made in an arbitration proceeding under the Business Rent Law (§ 15, as added by L. 1946, ch. 273, as amd.) dismissed, without costs. Appellant was not a party to the arbitration proceeding nor to the proceeding for confirmation of the award, and the order may not be set aside at its behest. (Barnum v. Borne, 273 App. Div. 774.) For the same reason, however, the order is not binding on appellant. (Dixon v. Talerico, 217 App. Div. 191.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate an order which confirms an award made in an arbitration proceeding under the Business Rent Law (§ 15, as added by L. 1946, ch. 273, as amd.) dismissed, without costs. Appellant was not a party to the arbitration proceeding nor to the proceeding for confirmation of the award, and the order may not be set aside at its behest. (Barnum v. Borne, 273 App. Div. 774.) For the same reason, however, the order is not binding on appellant. (Dixon v. Talerico, 217 App. Div. 191.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

In re the Arbitration between Romanoff & Nilow Realty Corp., 273 A.D. 788, 75 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

273 A.D. 788 (In re the Arbitration between Romanoff & Nilow Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related