In re the Arbitration between Red Hook Central School District & Red Hook Faculty Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Red Hook Central School District & Red Hook Faculty Ass'n

74 A.D.2d 606, 424 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10257

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 606 (In re the Arbitration between Red Hook Central School District & Red Hook Faculty Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Red Hook Central School District & Red Hook Faculty Ass'n, 74 A.D.2d 606, 424 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated April 20, 1979, which granted petitioner’s application and denied appellants’ cross motion to compel arbitration. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We agree that the board of education’s elimination of the subject activity from the school curriculum is not arbitrable under the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (see Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509; Matter of [607]*607Board of Educ. v West Babylon Teachers Assn., 60 AD2d 577). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated April 20, 1979, which granted petitioner’s application and denied appellants’ cross motion to compel arbitration. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We agree that the board of education’s elimination of the subject activity from the school curriculum is not arbitrable under the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (see Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509; Matter of [607]*607Board of Educ. v West Babylon Teachers Assn., 60 AD2d 577). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 606, 424 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-red-hook-central-school-district-red-hook-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack