In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance & Solodokin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance & Solodokin

93 A.D.2d 891, 461 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.D.2d 891 (In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance & Solodokin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance & Solodokin, 93 A.D.2d 891, 461 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by Flora and Arnie Solodokin (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), entered March 17,1982, which granted a permanent stay of arbitration; and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated October 5, 1982, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the judgment entered March 17, 1982, dismissed. That judgment was superseded by the order dated October 5, 1982, made upon reargument. Order dated October 5, 1982, affirmed, insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Petitioner is awarded one bill of costs. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by Flora and Arnie Solodokin (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), entered March 17,1982, which granted a permanent stay of arbitration; and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated October 5, 1982, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the judgment entered March 17, 1982, dismissed. That judgment was superseded by the order dated October 5, 1982, made upon reargument. Order dated October 5, 1982, affirmed, insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Petitioner is awarded one bill of costs. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.2d 891, 461 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-prudential-property-casualty-insurance-nyappdiv-1983.