In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

70 A.D.2d 953, 417 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12581

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 1979·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 75 to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme court, Kings County, dated August 1, 1978, which, after a trial on the issue of insurance coverage of a motor vehicle owned and operated by one Leon White (the hearing having been directed by an earlier order of that court, dated January 18, 1978) vacated a stay of arbitration granted in that earlier order and directed petitioner to proceed to arbitrate the uninsured motorist claim of claimants-respondents Bonnie L. Epstein and Eugene Epstein. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to respondent Government Employees Insurance Company. Although petitioner had the burden of establishing that the type size in the notice of cancellation did not comply with the minimum size requirement set forth in section 313 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see Matter of Nassau Ins. Co. [Newsome], 86 Mise 2d 942, affd 64 AD2d 986, on the opns at Special Term) it presented no evidence that the type was less than the required minimum 12-point size (cf. Nassau Ins. Co. v Hernandez, 65 AD2d 551). Further petitioner had no expert present and made no actual offer of proof purporting to show that the type was less than 12-point size. Accordingly, the judgment under review must be affirmed (cf. Nassau Ins. Co. v Hernandez, supra.) Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Lazer and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 75 to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme court, Kings County, dated August 1, 1978, which, after a trial on the issue of insurance coverage of a motor vehicle owned and operated by one Leon White (the hearing having been directed by an earlier order of that court, dated January 18, 1978) vacated a stay of arbitration granted in that earlier order and directed petitioner to proceed to arbitrate the uninsured motorist claim of claimants-respondents Bonnie L. Epstein and Eugene Epstein. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to respondent Government Employees Insurance Company. Although petitioner had the burden of establishing that the type size in the notice of cancellation did not comply with the minimum size requirement set forth in section 313 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see Matter of Nassau Ins. Co. [Newsome], 86 Mise 2d 942, affd 64 AD2d 986, on the opns at Special Term) it presented no evidence that the type was less than the required minimum 12-point size (cf. Nassau Ins. Co. v Hernandez, 65 AD2d 551). Further petitioner had no expert present and made no actual offer of proof purporting to show that the type was less than 12-point size. Accordingly, the judgment under review must be affirmed (cf. Nassau Ins. Co. v Hernandez, supra.) Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Lazer and Margett, JJ., concur.

In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance, 70 A.D.2d 953, 417 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

70 A.D.2d 953 (In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related