In re the Arbitration between Port Jefferson Station Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Port Jefferson Station Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education

77 A.D.2d 922, 432 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12704

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 18, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 77 A.D.2d 922 (In re the Arbitration between Port Jefferson Station Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Port Jefferson Station Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education, 77 A.D.2d 922, 432 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 22, 1979, which granted the petition and confirmed the award of the arbitrator. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The arbitrator’s award is neither irrational (see Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578) nor violative of public policy (see Matter of Antonopoulou v Beame, 32 NY2d 126; North Syracuse Cent. School Dist. v North Syracuse Educ. Assn., 45 NY2d 195). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 22, 1979, which granted the petition and confirmed the award of the arbitrator. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The arbitrator’s award is neither irrational (see Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578) nor violative of public policy (see Matter of Antonopoulou v Beame, 32 NY2d 126; North Syracuse Cent. School Dist. v North Syracuse Educ. Assn., 45 NY2d 195). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 922, 432 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-port-jefferson-station-teachers-assn-board-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack