In re the Arbitration between Polar Entertainment Corp. & Directors Guild of America, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Polar Entertainment Corp. & Directors Guild of America, Inc.

189 A.D.2d 711

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 1993·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered January 14, 1992, staying arbitration demanded by respondents for unpaid wages and fringe benefit contributions, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Notwithstanding the strong policy favoring arbitration of labor disputes, arbitration must be stayed where a prior agreement providing for arbitration has expired and the superseding agreement does not contain a clear agreement to arbitrate (Litton Fin. Print. Div. v National Labor Relations Bd., 501 US —, 111 S Ct 2215). Here, the services contract between petitioner producer and respondent director did not contain an arbitration clause but instead referred to the "now-current” Directors Guild Agreement, i.e., the 1984 Basic Agreement that expired before respondent had performed any services. Although the superseding 1987 Basic Agreement, like the one it replaced, contained an arbitration clause, petitioner producer is not a signatory thereto, and, for the reasons stated by the IAS Court, it would require too much "implication or subtlety” to find an agreement to arbitrate in the 1989 amendments to the services contract (Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 NY2d 181,184).

The determination of whether there is a clear, unequivocal and extant agreement to arbitrate the disputed claims at the time they arose is a question for the court and not the arbitrator (see, Sisters of St. John the Baptist v Geraghty Constructor, 67 NY2d 997, 998). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross, and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered January 14, 1992, staying arbitration demanded by respondents for unpaid wages and fringe benefit contributions, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Notwithstanding the strong policy favoring arbitration of labor disputes, arbitration must be stayed where a prior agreement providing for arbitration has expired and the superseding agreement does not contain a clear agreement to arbitrate (Litton Fin. Print. Div. v National Labor Relations Bd., 501 US —, 111 S Ct 2215). Here, the services contract between petitioner producer and respondent director did not contain an arbitration clause but instead referred to the "now-current” Directors Guild Agreement, i.e., the 1984 Basic Agreement that expired before respondent had performed any services. Although the superseding 1987 Basic Agreement, like the one it replaced, contained an arbitration clause, petitioner producer is not a signatory thereto, and, for the reasons stated by the IAS Court, it would require too much "implication or subtlety” to find an agreement to arbitrate in the 1989 amendments to the services contract (Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 NY2d 181,184).

The determination of whether there is a clear, unequivocal and extant agreement to arbitrate the disputed claims at the time they arose is a question for the court and not the arbitrator (see, Sisters of St. John the Baptist v Geraghty Constructor, 67 NY2d 997, 998). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross, and Kassal, JJ.

In re the Arbitration between Polar Entertainment Corp. & Directors Guild of America, Inc., 189 A.D.2d 711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

189 A.D.2d 711 (In re the Arbitration between Polar Entertainment Corp. & Directors Guild of America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related