In re the Arbitration between Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of Newburgh, New York, Inc., & City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of Newburgh, New York, Inc., & City of Newburgh

55 A.D.2d 934, 390 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10202

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 934 (In re the Arbitration between Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of Newburgh, New York, Inc., & City of Newburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of Newburgh, New York, Inc., & City of Newburgh, 55 A.D.2d 934, 390 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, in [935]*935which the City of Newburgh cross-moved to vacate the said award, the city appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated June 28, 1976, which granted the application and denied its cross motion. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term properly concluded that there are no statutory grounds for vacating the award of the arbitrator (see CPLR 7511, subd [b]). Furthermore, arbitrators are not bound by principles of substantive law when making their determinations (Matter of Associated Teachers of Huntington v Board of Educ., 33 NY2d 229). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, in [935]*935which the City of Newburgh cross-moved to vacate the said award, the city appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated June 28, 1976, which granted the application and denied its cross motion. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term properly concluded that there are no statutory grounds for vacating the award of the arbitrator (see CPLR 7511, subd [b]). Furthermore, arbitrators are not bound by principles of substantive law when making their determinations (Matter of Associated Teachers of Huntington v Board of Educ., 33 NY2d 229). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 934, 390 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-patrolmens-benevolent-assn-of-newburgh-new-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack