In re the Arbitration between Palace & Transworld Attractions Corp.
This text of 43 A.D.2d 523 (In re the Arbitration between Palace & Transworld Attractions Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 22,1972 and November 27,1972, respectively, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No costs are allowed because the record suggests no reason why these proceedings were not brought in the Civil Court (Travelers Ins. Co. v. haw Besearch Sen., 34 A D 2d 764; Trussell v. Strongo, 29 A D 2d 851;.Matter of Mikos [MVAIC], 51 Mise 2d 643; CCA, § 206). No opinion. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Murphy, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A.D.2d 523, 349 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-palace-transworld-attractions-corp-nyappdiv-1973.