In Re the Arbitration Between Ottley & Mostoff
426 N.E.2d 483, 54 N.Y.2d 698, 442 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2632
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. While we do not agree with the analysis articulated by the *700 Appellate Division, we cannot say on this record that the arbitrator committed misconduct.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Arbitration Between Ottley & Mostoff, 426 N.E.2d 483, 54 N.Y.2d 698, 442 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2632 (N.Y. 1981).
426 N.E.2d 483 (In Re the Arbitration Between Ottley & Mostoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Arbitration between Bevona & Superior Maintenance Co.
204 A.D.2d 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Doris Trading Corp. v. Melody Knitting Mills, Inc.
172 A.D.2d 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Arbitration between Herskovitz & L.B. Kaye Associates, Ltd.
170 A.D.2d 272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Omega Contracting, Inc. v. Maropakis Contracting, Inc.
160 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)