In re the Arbitration between Otselic Valley Central School District & Otselic Valley Teachers Ass'n

91 A.D.2d 1122, 458 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16462
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Zeller, J.), entered September 10, 1982 in Chenango County, which denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration. Order affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Howard A. Zeller at Special Term. We add only that the school district’s contention that the grievance was premature and improperly filed was not raised before Special Term and therefore need not be considered now (Cameron v Andrukiewicz, 87 AD2d 734). Were we to heed that argument, we would reject it for it essentially raises an issue of justiciability for the arbitrator to resolve (Board of Educ. v Patchoque-Medford Congress of Teachers, 48 NY2d 812; Matter of Board of Educ. [Greenburgh Teachers Federation, Local 1788 of Amer. Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO], 85 AD2d 663). Kane, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Arbitration between Otselic Valley Central School District & Otselic Valley Teachers Ass'n, 91 A.D.2d 1122, 458 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

91 A.D.2d 1122 (In re the Arbitration between Otselic Valley Central School District & Otselic Valley Teachers Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryan v. Ryan
177 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)