In re the Arbitration between O'Connell & Helpers of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between O'Connell & Helpers of America

283 A.D. 869, 129 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5593

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 869 (In re the Arbitration between O'Connell & Helpers of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between O'Connell & Helpers of America, 283 A.D. 869, 129 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by directing the clerk to retax disbursements to the extent of deducting the sum of $192.40 for printing that part of the record relating to the appeal which was dismissed [870]*870and the sum of $20 for printing that part of points relating to the dismissed appeal. These items are properly allocable to the order which denied the motion to vacate the award on the ground of misconduct, the appeal from which was dismissed, without costs. As so modified, the order is affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Botein and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified by directing the clerk to retax disbursements to the extent of deducting the sum of $192.40 for printing that part of the record relating to the appeal which was dismissed [870]*870and the sum of $20 for printing that part of points relating to the dismissed appeal. These items are properly allocable to the order which denied the motion to vacate the award on the ground of misconduct, the appeal from which was dismissed, without costs. As so modified, the order is affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Botein and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 869, 129 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-oconnell-helpers-of-america-nyappdiv-1954.