In Re the Arbitration Between Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority & International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 2028

New York Court of Appeals

In Re the Arbitration Between Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority & International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 2028

925 N.E.2d 85, 14 N.Y.3d 749, 898 N.Y.S.2d 82, 2010 NY Slip Op 63195, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 3843

DecidedFebruary 16, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 925 N.E.2d 85 (In Re the Arbitration Between Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority & International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 2028) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Arbitration Between Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority & International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 2028, 925 N.E.2d 85, 14 N.Y.3d 749, 898 N.Y.S.2d 82, 2010 NY Slip Op 63195, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 3843 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from Supreme Court’s December 2008 order, dismissed upon the ground that appellant is not a party aggrieved (see CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from Supreme Court’s January 2009 order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from Supreme Court’s December 2008 order, dismissed upon the ground that appellant is not a party aggrieved (see CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from Supreme Court’s January 2009 order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 N.E.2d 85, 14 N.Y.3d 749, 898 N.Y.S.2d 82, 2010 NY Slip Op 63195, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 3843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-niagara-frontier-transportation-authority-ny-2010.