In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & Wilson

200 A.D.2d 520, 608 N.Y.S.2d 817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 200 A.D.2d 520 (In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & Wilson, 200 A.D.2d 520, 608 N.Y.S.2d 817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (William N. Ellison, J.), entered on or about December 7, 1992, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that the evidence demonstrates that the policy of insurance issued by the New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association had [521]*521been effectively cancelled prior to the accident on June 25, 1989 in accordance with the applicable provisions of the New Jersey Revised Statutes. Therefore, the petition to stay arbitration was appropriately denied. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (William N. Ellison, J.), entered on or about December 7, 1992, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that the evidence demonstrates that the policy of insurance issued by the New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association had [521]*521been effectively cancelled prior to the accident on June 25, 1989 in accordance with the applicable provisions of the New Jersey Revised Statutes. Therefore, the petition to stay arbitration was appropriately denied. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 520, 608 N.Y.S.2d 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-new-york-central-mutual-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-1994.