In re the Arbitration between Myers & Leibel
This text of 107 N.E.2d 512 (In re the Arbitration between Myers & Leibel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughrax, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmoxd and Dye, JJ. Fuld and Froessel, JJ., dissent upon the ground that appellants are entitled to arbitration unconditionally; whenever Leibel brought dissolution proceedings, appellants would be entitled to a stay under the provisions of section 1451 of the Civil Practice Act. Not sitting: Conway, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 N.E.2d 512, 304 N.Y. 656, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-myers-leibel-ny-1952.