In re the Arbitration between Myers & Leibel

107 N.E.2d 512, 304 N.Y. 656, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 885
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 15, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 107 N.E.2d 512 (In re the Arbitration between Myers & Leibel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Myers & Leibel, 107 N.E.2d 512, 304 N.Y. 656, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 885 (N.Y. 1952).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughrax, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmoxd and Dye, JJ. Fuld and Froessel, JJ., dissent upon the ground that appellants are entitled to arbitration unconditionally; whenever Leibel brought dissolution proceedings, appellants would be entitled to a stay under the provisions of section 1451 of the Civil Practice Act. Not sitting: Conway, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart Becker, Ltd. v. Horowitz
94 Misc. 2d 766 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Moskowitz v. Surrey Sleep Products, Inc.
30 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
In re the Arbitration between Burkin & Katz
286 A.D. 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 N.E.2d 512, 304 N.Y. 656, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-myers-leibel-ny-1952.