In re the Arbitration between Myers & Leibel
107 N.E.2d 512, 304 N.Y. 656, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 885
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughrax, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmoxd and Dye, JJ. Fuld and Froessel, JJ., dissent upon the ground that appellants are entitled to arbitration unconditionally; whenever Leibel brought dissolution proceedings, appellants would be entitled to a stay under the provisions of section 1451 of the Civil Practice Act. Not sitting: Conway, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Arbitration between Myers & Leibel, 107 N.E.2d 512, 304 N.Y. 656, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 885 (N.Y. 1952).
107 N.E.2d 512 (In re the Arbitration between Myers & Leibel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stewart Becker, Ltd. v. Horowitz
94 Misc. 2d 766 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Moskowitz v. Surrey Sleep Products, Inc.
30 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
In re the Arbitration between Burkin & Katz
286 A.D. 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)