In re the Arbitration between Morrow & General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
Opinion
The facts and the legal issues arising upon them are well outlined and defined in the comprehensive opinion of Mr. Justice Main at Special Term. It is clear that the arbitrators’ powers were “so imperfectly executed * * * that a * * * definite award upon the subject-matter submitted was not made”. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1462, subd. 4.) In consequence, the vacatur and resubmission were proper, as was the confirmation of the amended award. (Matter of Zephyr Gonstr. Go. [Boro Hall Corp.], 7 A D 2d 915 and cases cited p. 916, second appeal 10 A D 2d 867; 21 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, §§ 170, 172, pp. 575, 576.) Orders affirmed, with $20 costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
20 A.D.2d 741 (In re the Arbitration between Morrow & General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.