In re the Arbitration between Minkin & Halperin
This text of 107 N.E.2d 94 (In re the Arbitration between Minkin & Halperin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Dye and Fboessel, JJ. Desmond and Fuld, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order appealed from and to dismiss the petition, with costs, on the ground that sufficient appears in the papers to show an issue of fact, triable by the arbitrators, as to the existence of a valid release. Not sitting: Conway, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 N.E.2d 94, 304 N.Y. 617, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-minkin-halperin-ny-1952.