In re the Arbitration between Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

75 A.D.2d 645, 431 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11111

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 A.D.2d 645 (In re the Arbitration between Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 75 A.D.2d 645, 431 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 1979, which denied its application and ordered that the parties shall forthwith proceed to arbitration of respondent’s claim. Resettled judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and petition granted. Respondent is not entitled to no-fault insurance benefits since her alleged injuries did not result from the "use or operation” of a motor vehicle as contemplated by section 670 et seq. of the Insurance Law. Therefore, arbitration of respondent’s no-fault claim should have been stayed. (See Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. [Gbolson], 71 AD2d 1004.) Lazer, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 1979, which denied its application and ordered that the parties shall forthwith proceed to arbitration of respondent’s claim. Resettled judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and petition granted. Respondent is not entitled to no-fault insurance benefits since her alleged injuries did not result from the "use or operation” of a motor vehicle as contemplated by section 670 et seq. of the Insurance Law. Therefore, arbitration of respondent’s no-fault claim should have been stayed. (See Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. [Gbolson], 71 AD2d 1004.) Lazer, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A.D.2d 645, 431 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-manhattan-bronx-surface-transit-operating-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack