In re the Arbitration Between Local 584, Bartenders & Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union & Edison Club

18 A.D.2d 949, 237 N.Y.S.2d 679, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2617, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4439

This text of 18 A.D.2d 949 (In re the Arbitration Between Local 584, Bartenders & Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union & Edison Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration Between Local 584, Bartenders & Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union & Edison Club, 18 A.D.2d 949, 237 N.Y.S.2d 679, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2617, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

In the respondent employer's labor contract with the petitioner union it was agreed that “ the interpretation ” or “ application ” of a “provision of” the contract was the subject of arbitration. The union has demanded arbitration in disputes as to whether one of its members should be paid as a receiving clerk or stockman and whether another member should be paid higher than the intermediate janitor’s rate for regular janitor. The classifications and the rates for regular janitor at various levels and the classifications and rate for receiving clerk are all set forth in the contract. The application and interpretation of the contract are within the agreement to arbitrate and the arbitration should proceed. (Matter of Grayson-Robinson Stores, 8 N Y 2d 133, 138; Matter of Sealtest Foods Division [Milk, Ice Cream Drivers & Dairy Employees, Local No. 787], 18 A D 2d 947; see Steelworkers v. American Mfg. Co., 363 U. S. 564, 566-568.) Order denying petitioner’s application reversed and application granted, with $10 costs. Bergan, P, J,, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.
363 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.2d 949, 237 N.Y.S.2d 679, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2617, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-local-584-bartenders-hotel-restaurant-nyappdiv-1963.