In re the Arbitration between Livingston & Cheney-Frantex, Longford-Weavers, Inc.
This text of 14 A.D.2d 518 (In re the Arbitration between Livingston & Cheney-Frantex, Longford-Weavers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The award is invalid as to Mayar Silk Mills, Inc., not a party to. the contract or the arbitration proceeding. (Matter of Brescia Constr. Co. v. Walart Constr. Co., 264 N. Y. 260.) Moreover, the award is not mutual, final and definite (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1462, subd. 4) in that it fails to state the amount of damages or the basis for computation thereof. (Meyer v. Merritt, 7 A D 2d 917; Matter of Albert J. Pfeiffer, Inc. [Largman, Gray Co.], 22-2 App. Div. 62.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.2d 518, 216 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-livingston-cheney-frantex-nyappdiv-1961.