In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis

8 A.D.2d 612, 184 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8923

This text of 8 A.D.2d 612 (In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis, 8 A.D.2d 612, 184 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by eliminating the last ordered paragraph in the order appealed from, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The award is responsive to the respective demands for arbitration. Any dispute incident to compliance with the award may be properly the subject of further arbitration, but that question is not yet reached. Under the circumstances, the appointment of a referee to take and state the account is unnecessary. (Matter of Hunter [Proser], 274 App. Div. 311, affd. 298 N. Y. 828.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Arbitration Between Hunter & Proser
84 N.E.2d 143 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
In re the Arbitration between Hunter & Proser
274 A.D. 311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 612, 184 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-koppell-davis-nyappdiv-1959.