In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis

8 A.D.2d 612, 184 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8923

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 1959·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by eliminating the last ordered paragraph in the order appealed from, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The award is responsive to the respective demands for arbitration. Any dispute incident to compliance with the award may be properly the subject of further arbitration, but that question is not yet reached. Under the circumstances, the appointment of a referee to take and state the account is unnecessary. (Matter of Hunter [Proser], 274 App. Div. 311, affd. 298 N. Y. 828.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by eliminating the last ordered paragraph in the order appealed from, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The award is responsive to the respective demands for arbitration. Any dispute incident to compliance with the award may be properly the subject of further arbitration, but that question is not yet reached. Under the circumstances, the appointment of a referee to take and state the account is unnecessary. (Matter of Hunter [Proser], 274 App. Div. 311, affd. 298 N. Y. 828.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis, 8 A.D.2d 612, 184 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

8 A.D.2d 612 (In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related