In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis
This text of 8 A.D.2d 612 (In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by eliminating the last ordered paragraph in the order appealed from, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The award is responsive to the respective demands for arbitration. Any dispute incident to compliance with the award may be properly the subject of further arbitration, but that question is not yet reached. Under the circumstances, the appointment of a referee to take and state the account is unnecessary. (Matter of Hunter [Proser], 274 App. Div. 311, affd. 298 N. Y. 828.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.2d 612, 184 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-koppell-davis-nyappdiv-1959.