In re the Arbitration between Kissen & Roslyn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Kissen & Roslyn

109 A.D.2d 883, 487 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.2d 883 (In re the Arbitration between Kissen & Roslyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Kissen & Roslyn, 109 A.D.2d 883, 487 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitrator’s award, with a cross application to confirm such award, petitioner appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.), dated December 19, 1983, which confirmed the arbitrator’s award and (2) an order of the same court, dated February 24, 1984, which denied her application for leave to renew and/or reargue her application to vacate the arbitrator’s award.

Appeal from so much of the order as denied reargument dismissed. The denial of reargument is not appealable.

Order and judgment otherwise affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Cohen at Special Term.

Respondents are awarded one bill of costs. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitrator’s award, with a cross application to confirm such award, petitioner appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.), dated December 19, 1983, which confirmed the arbitrator’s award and (2) an order of the same court, dated February 24, 1984, which denied her application for leave to renew and/or reargue her application to vacate the arbitrator’s award.

Appeal from so much of the order as denied reargument dismissed. The denial of reargument is not appealable.

Order and judgment otherwise affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Cohen at Special Term.

Respondents are awarded one bill of costs. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 883, 487 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-kissen-roslyn-nyappdiv-1985.