In re the Arbitration between Jay Kay Metal Specialties Corp. & United Service Employees Union, Local 377

285 A.D. 81, 135 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3282
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 81 (In re the Arbitration between Jay Kay Metal Specialties Corp. & United Service Employees Union, Local 377) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Jay Kay Metal Specialties Corp. & United Service Employees Union, Local 377, 285 A.D. 81, 135 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinions

Botein, J.

The agreement provides that any and all disputes shall first be taken up for adjustment by representatives of the parties, and that the dispute shall be submitted to arbitration only in the event of failure to bring about an adjustment. This provision was explicitly and pointedly brought to the attention of the union by the employer’s attorney in his letter of April 22,1954, in which he also made it clear that the employer was holding, as escrowee, the funds which are the subject matter of the controversy. The employer’s position has always been that this is essentially a dispute between two competing locals, that the employer is only concerned peripherally, but seeks to avert the very real danger of being obliged to repay a similar amount to the other local. Such a dispute is one which might lend itself readily to resolution by the process of friendly negotiation. Nevertheless, the union rejected the employer’s implicit invitation to negotiate, and served its demand for arbitration a few days after receipt of the letter of April 22, 1954.

I therefore vote to affirm on the ground that the arbitration demand was made prematurely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 A.D. 81, 135 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-jay-kay-metal-specialties-corp-united-nyappdiv-1954.