In re the Arbitration between James Talcott, Inc. & M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc.
309 N.E.2d 124, 33 N.Y.2d 924, 353 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 859
This text of 309 N.E.2d 124 (In re the Arbitration between James Talcott, Inc. & M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between James Talcott, Inc. & M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., 309 N.E.2d 124, 33 N.Y.2d 924, 353 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 859 (N.Y. 1973).
Opinions
Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Judges Bubke, Bbeitel, Jasen and Gabeielli. Judge Jones dissents and votes to reverse in the following opinion in which Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Wachtler concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Banque De Paris Et Des Pays-Bas v. Amoco Oil Co.
573 F. Supp. 1464 (S.D. New York, 1983)
In re the Arbitration between SCM Corp. & Fisher Park Lane Co.
358 N.E.2d 1024 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
309 N.E.2d 124, 33 N.Y.2d 924, 353 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-james-talcott-inc-m-lowenstein-sons-ny-1973.