In re the Arbitration between Insurance Co. of North America & Carrozo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Insurance Co. of North America & Carrozo

203 A.D.2d 210, 611 N.Y.S.2d 171

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 210 (In re the Arbitration between Insurance Co. of North America & Carrozo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Insurance Co. of North America & Carrozo, 203 A.D.2d 210, 611 N.Y.S.2d 171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robert Roberto, J.), entered December 4, 1989, which, inter alia, granted the petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration, and order of said court and Justice entered September 3, 1992, which denied respondent’s motion to vacate the December 4, 1989 judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As the evidence does not establish that petitioner’s insured’s vehicle collided with an unidentified vehicle or that the metal gear box, which was propelled into Carrozo’s vehicle, was an integral part of the unidentified vehicle, there was no "physical contact” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5217 (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Killakey, 78 NY2d 325, 329). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robert Roberto, J.), entered December 4, 1989, which, inter alia, granted the petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration, and order of said court and Justice entered September 3, 1992, which denied respondent’s motion to vacate the December 4, 1989 judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As the evidence does not establish that petitioner’s insured’s vehicle collided with an unidentified vehicle or that the metal gear box, which was propelled into Carrozo’s vehicle, was an integral part of the unidentified vehicle, there was no "physical contact” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5217 (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Killakey, 78 NY2d 325, 329). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 210, 611 N.Y.S.2d 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-insurance-co-of-north-america-carrozo-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack