In re the Arbitration between Holliday & Samuels
278 A.D. 687, 103 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4362
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 1951
StatusPublished
This text of 278 A.D. 687 (In re the Arbitration between Holliday & Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Holliday & Samuels, 278 A.D. 687, 103 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
Opinions
Order affirmed, -with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re the Arbitration Between Snaider & Mano Hoffner Fur Corp.
67 N.E.2d 255 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Stefano Berizzi Co. v. Krausz
146 N.E. 436 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
In Re the Arbitration Between Springs Cotton Mills & Buster Boy Suit Co.
89 N.E.2d 877 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
In re the Arbitration between Marchant & Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
226 A.D. 397 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
In re the Arbitration between Snaider & Manu Hoffner Fur Corp.
269 A.D. 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 687, 103 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-holliday-samuels-nyappdiv-1951.