In re the Arbitration between Holliday & Samuels
278 A.D. 687, 103 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4362
Opinions
Order affirmed, -with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Arbitration between Holliday & Samuels, 278 A.D. 687, 103 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
278 A.D. 687 (In re the Arbitration between Holliday & Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Arbitration Between Snaider & Mano Hoffner Fur Corp.
67 N.E.2d 255 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Stefano Berizzi Co. v. Krausz
146 N.E. 436 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
In Re the Arbitration Between Springs Cotton Mills & Buster Boy Suit Co.
89 N.E.2d 877 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
In re the Arbitration between Marchant & Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
226 A.D. 397 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
In re the Arbitration between Snaider & Manu Hoffner Fur Corp.
269 A.D. 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)